Archive for the ‘qrp’ Category
Even better low-pass filters for transmitters
The last issues of QEX have featured two interesting articles by Gary Cobb, G3TMG. He outlines the advantage of using Zolotarev designs for the harmonic suppression filters of transmitters, giving even better suppression of the second harmonic than the more common Chebyshev or quasi-elliptic filters.
![]() |
Chebyshev low-pass filter from the GQRP data sheet (issue 1) |
My interest in this was triggered by the test of the Ultimate 3 QRSS/WSPR kit from QRP Labs in the Nov 2016 QST. The review was positive overall, but it was remarked that the harmonic suppression does not meet FCC requirements (-43 dBc or better). I am not sure whether this is due to PCB layout issues, or if better filters can alleviate it, but I note that the design uses the simplest filter of the ones I have listed here.
The evolution of filters for use for harmonic suppression follows at least these three steps:
- Chebyshev type I filters with equiripple in the passband and a monotonically falling, maximally flat stopband. A 7-pole version with three inductors and four capacitors in a pi-network has been around for a while, in e.g. the old recommendation from the GQRP club. It was based on the QST paper “Low-pass filters for amateur radio transmitters,” Ed Wetherhold, W3NQN, Dec. 1979. Two designs for a 20 m filter were given there:
1) Max. ripple in passband: 0.00731 dB, attenuation at 28 MHz: 40.7 dB
1) Max. ripple in passband: 0.00960 dB, attenuation at 28 MHz: 34.5 dB Second-harmonic optimized low-pass filter from the
GQRP data sheet (issue 2)An improved stopband was the topic of W3NQN’s article “Second-harmonic optimized low-pass filters” in QST Feb. 1999. Here there is one additional capacitor as the central inductor is made into a parallel resonance which gives a zero in the stopband, based on an idea by Jum Tonne, WB6BLD. The design goal is that this zero should be at the second harmonic frequency. W3NQN proposed to call this a Chebyshev filter with a zero (CWAZ) filter, but it is more correct to call it a quasi- or pseudo-elliptic filter as remarked by G3TMG. It increases the attenuation at the second-harmonic in the 20 m design to better than 60 dB. This design is the basis for the current (Issue 2) G-QRP technical sheet. This would also be interesting to test in the QRP Labs Ultimate 3 transmitter kit.
Zolotarev low-pass filter from the Nov/Dec 2016 QEX article G3TMG in the new QEX articles has noticed that the passband is over-specified in the above filters as the lower 60% or so of the passband is unused. The Zolotarev design allows for more passband ripple in this part where it does not matter. The advantage is even better stopband attenuation. A measured example for a 60 m filter has a passband ripple of 0.17 dB and a stopband attenuation at the second harmonic of 71 dB. This filter has the same component count as the previous one, but the filter is no longer symmetric like the two previous ones. The increase in second-harmonic suppression is not as great as the going from the first filters to the second, but should still be worth the effort.
- Gary Cobb, G3TMG, Zolotarev low-pass filter design, QEX, July/Aug 2016.
- Gary Cobb, G3TMG, A more efficient low-pass filter, QEX, Nov/Dec 2016.
Even better low-pass filters for transmitters
The last issues of QEX have featured two interesting articles by Gary Cobb, G3TMG. He outlines the advantage of using Zolotarev designs for the harmonic suppression filters of transmitters, giving even better suppression of the second harmonic than the more common Chebyshev or quasi-elliptic filters.
![]() |
Chebyshev low-pass filter from the GQRP data sheet (issue 1) |
My interest in this was triggered by the test of the Ultimate 3 QRSS/WSPR kit from QRP Labs in the Nov 2016 QST. The review was positive overall, but it was remarked that the harmonic suppression does not meet FCC requirements (-43 dBc or better). I am not sure whether this is due to PCB layout issues, or if better filters can alleviate it, but I note that the design uses the simplest filter of the ones I have listed here.
The evolution of filters for use for harmonic suppression follows at least these three steps:
- Chebyshev type I filters with equiripple in the passband and a monotonically falling, maximally flat stopband. A 7-pole version with three inductors and four capacitors in a pi-network has been around for a while, in e.g. the old recommendation from the GQRP club. It was based on the QST paper “Low-pass filters for amateur radio transmitters,” Ed Wetherhold, W3NQN, Dec. 1979. Two designs for a 20 m filter were given there:
1) Max. ripple in passband: 0.00731 dB, attenuation at 28 MHz: 40.7 dB
1) Max. ripple in passband: 0.00960 dB, attenuation at 28 MHz: 34.5 dB Second-harmonic optimized low-pass filter from the
GQRP data sheet (issue 2)An improved stopband was the topic of W3NQN’s article “Second-harmonic optimized low-pass filters” in QST Feb. 1999. Here there is one additional capacitor as the central inductor is made into a parallel resonance which gives a zero in the stopband, based on an idea by Jim Tonne, WB6BLD. The design goal is that this zero should be at the second harmonic frequency. W3NQN proposed to call this a Chebyshev filter with a zero (CWAZ) filter, but it is more correct to call it a quasi- or pseudo-elliptic filter as remarked by G3TMG. It increases the attenuation at the second-harmonic in the 20 m design to better than 60 dB. This design is the basis for the current (Issue 2) G-QRP technical sheet. This would also be interesting to test in the QRP Labs Ultimate 3 transmitter kit.
Zolotarev low-pass filter from the Nov/Dec 2016 QEX article G3TMG in the new QEX articles has noticed that the passband is over-specified in the above filters as the lower 60% or so of the passband is unused. The Zolotarev design allows for more passband ripple in this part where it does not matter. The advantage is even better stopband attenuation. A measured example for a 60 m filter has a passband ripple of 0.17 dB and a stopband attenuation at the second harmonic of 71 dB. This filter has the same component count as the previous one, but the filter is no longer symmetric like the two previous ones. The increase in second-harmonic suppression is not as great as the going from the first filters to the second, but should still be worth the effort.
- Gary Cobb, G3TMG, Zolotarev low-pass filter design, QEX, July/Aug 2016.
- Gary Cobb, G3TMG, A more efficient low-pass filter, QEX, Nov/Dec 2016.
Taking your QRP signal to the next step.
DXing Tips For Little Pistols Like Me
Taking your QRP signal to the next step.
DXing Tips For Little Pistols Like Me
Here are some additional tricks to slay that DXing dragon I learned from Brian Smith WO9I. Some are
(1) "Sharpen your sword. Never embark on a DX quest without first tuning-up your rig. Make sure
(2) See which bands are open before starting the hunt. Bandconditions.com is a good resource.
(3) Never send “CQ DX.” Rare and even not so rare DX station seldom answer such calls, especially
(4) Use the contests. If you could operate only a few days a year, I’d pick the weekends of the major
(5) After the contest, hang around, to see if rare stations—particulary DXpeditions—want to hang
(6) Peek into the DX alleys, which are usually located just inside the General band
(7) Know when to quit. Don’t spend your life trying to break pile-ups; when the band’s open,
(8) Nail the newcomers. Now for real guerilla tactics: Move to the slow edge of a band and,
Late means wait. As you’re hunting stations coming on frequency, also check for QSOs that are
(10) Develop DX ears. DX signals rarely sound like statesiders. They’re weaker and more
(11) Be watchful for 10 or 12 meter openings. Ten meters is the little guy’s equalizer. When the
(12) WFWL (work first worry later). If an exotic-sounding station appears, don’t look up its
Rehearse. Rare DX stations are sometimes barely audible, or covered with QRM. A trained ear
(13) Upgrade. Much of the delectable DX swims in the extra portion of the band. Thus reeling it
(14) Rock around the clock. DX conditions vary with the time of day, so don’t just operate from
Turn lemons into lemonade. “Bad breaks” aren’t always what they seem. Sometimes they even
(15) Talk the talk. Even with Q signals, all CW stations don’t sound the same. DX stations favour
(16) Less is Morse. Not only CW is less popular than SSB (decreasing your competition), but
Read the news. Serious operators learn about DXpeditions and such by subscribing to publications
(17) Never assume. Once, during a Boy Scout jamboree weekend, I heard a Liberian station with
(18) Beat the bushes. Many people think all the primo DX hangs out on the low ends, but
Listen for swan songs. Normally, when sunspots are high, upper HF bands such as 10 and
(19) Check and double check the DX call. Don’t just scribble down a DX callsign; make
Do they have to be LOUD to work them????
![]() |
Learning a QRP lesson |
1. He was in and out right at the noise floor.
2. He was not at the QRP watering hole so he was running most likely some kind of QRO power.
3. What chance did my QRP 5 watt signal have if I could barely hear QRO signal?
When RA3XM stopped calling CQ I threw my call out there and can you believe he came back to me on my first call!! I was shocked that I made the distance, it was not a long QSO but I did get a 559 signal report and I passed along to him a signal report, my name and that I was running QRP. It became crystal clear to me of something I read on more than one occasion from seasoned QRP op's....you may come across signals that are in and out of the mud, don't short change yourself ( I have done so on many occasions) thinking "they are QRO and in the mud they are never going to hear my peanut signal. Instead throw your call out there and you may be surprised......and when RA3XM came back to me from the noise I was surprised and pleased to make the contact. Spinning the dial once again I hear AN400R booming in (Spanish special event station) I gave him a call and and made that contact as well. On this outing it was not as simple as calling and making a contact there was F6EJN, DK7OB, AN400C, IT9RZU, MI0GH and AN400C all who I called and was not heard. A valuable lesson was learned on this outing.....even if the station calling CQ is in the mud give them a call and you (I was) may be surprised they come back to you.
Do they have to be LOUD to work them????
![]() |
Learning a QRP lesson |
1. He was in and out right at the noise floor.
2. He was not at the QRP watering hole so he was running most likely some kind of QRO power.
3. What chance did my QRP 5 watt signal have if I could barely hear QRO signal?
When RA3XM stopped calling CQ I threw my call out there and can you believe he came back to me on my first call!! I was shocked that I made the distance, it was not a long QSO but I did get a 559 signal report and I passed along to him a signal report, my name and that I was running QRP. It became crystal clear to me of something I read on more than one occasion from seasoned QRP op's....you may come across signals that are in and out of the mud, don't short change yourself ( I have done so on many occasions) thinking "they are QRO and in the mud they are never going to hear my peanut signal. Instead throw your call out there and you may be surprised......and when RA3XM came back to me from the noise I was surprised and pleased to make the contact. Spinning the dial once again I hear AN400R booming in (Spanish special event station) I gave him a call and and made that contact as well. On this outing it was not as simple as calling and making a contact there was F6EJN, DK7OB, AN400C, IT9RZU, MI0GH and AN400C all who I called and was not heard. A valuable lesson was learned on this outing.....even if the station calling CQ is in the mud give them a call and you (I was) may be surprised they come back to you.
Portable QRP operations in the park.
![]() |
Hunting for that one contact |