We love new gear, don’t we?
I’ve been watching with some amusement as the news continues to break about the newest entry into the ham gear market…Kenwood’s TS-990S. It dovetails nicely with other big roll-outs such as Elecraft’s KX-3. As soon as the ad for the 990 appeared on the back of last month’s QST and CQ with word that a prototype would be shown at Dayton, the message boards have exploded with speculation about what kind of rig it would be, what features it would have, how much it would cost, and more. And there were the immediate negative comments, too.
“Who needs another ($4000, $5000, $10,000, $Trillion…take your pick) ham rig?”
“Why don’t they do a QRP rig instead of another (IC-7600, IC-7700, IC-7800, FT-5000, FT-9000…take your pick) clone transceiver?”
“Will it have a band scope?” “Will it have (one, two, three, sixteen…take your pick) USB ports?” “It’s bigger than the TS-850. I don’t want it.” It’s smaller than the TS-850. I don’t want it.”
There have even been many who denigrate Kenwood for their lack of marketing acumen on so many scores you would actually think those posters actually knew anything at all about the top-secret radio. Or assume they know more about marketing ham gear than Kenwood–who has been doing it for many, many years now.
Then things really went bonkers this week with the publication of an ad on the back page of the June QST:
Good evening Don, yes this simple picture sure has stirred things up eh!! With Dayton just around the corner and that being the time new ham toys are being dreamed about by hams as they sleep. Im not sure if it’s real or a hoax but time will tell which one it is……but I will say your post was very interesting and got me thinking.
Mike
VE3WDM
I have a ‘590 and I like it. I have a TS-440 and my dad at the time couldn’t afford the TS-940, and I now couldn’t afford the TS-990. So I see it as a very interesting tradition that they are carrying on. It’s amazing how the overall “feel” of the 990 is like the 940 was and to a lesser extent (until you use it) the ‘590 is like the ‘440.
I knew last year at Dayton that this one was going to be the expensive one– so did everyone else. I wonder why the comments now? It was no surprise!
Fred W0FMS
Just remember, Kenwood’s philosophy… If we build it, they will buy it. Tried Kenwood before due to so many touting them. Never again. But that’s me. If that’s what works for you great.
I ran a TS-570D for 3 years and was very impressed with it’s performance once I got the narrow filter for it and actually received unsolicited compliments on my audio using a Heil Proset Plus headset with it. I sold it about 3 years ago when I ran across a good deal on a Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark V and absolutely love it! I would not be reluctant at all to own another Kenwood, I just hope the TS-990S is real because it actually looks like a ham radio instead of a piece of Kenwood audio equipment like all their HF rigs have for the past few years! Anyway, probably too high for my pockets! I’m wanting a Flex 3000 now since I’ve heard quiet a few of them on the air on 75 meters and it is really appealing to me to be able to put a filter or as many filters as I desire on at the same time and being able to take the computer mouse and drag the width of those filters as wide or as narrow as I like. The ultimate in working through the QRM!